OFDI promotion policies in emerging economies: the Brazilian and Chinese strategies

Author:

Carlos Zalaf Caseiro Luiz,Masiero Gilmar

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to analyze how the Brazilian and Chinese outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) policies can contribute to the economic development of their home countries. Design/methodology/approach – The aforementioned objective is achieved through a comparative analysis of the Brazilian and Chinese OFDI policies within a new theoretical framework for examining the developmental implications of OFDI. Both primary and secondary data are utilized to compare Brazilian and Chinese strategies. Findings – It was concluded that Brazil and China have shifted from a development strategy centered on internal market self-sufficiency to one that seeks international economic prominence by, among other strategies, adopting OFDI support as a part of their industrial policy agenda. However, while the Chinese Government has focused on cross-national acquisitions of assets that are scarce within the country, the Brazilian Government has preferred to support industries that are already highly competitive internationally. The Chinese strategy has a greater potential to generate positive spillovers to domestic economy. Social implications – This paper ends with recommendations on how Brazil, in particular, and emerging economies, in general, may improve their OFDI policies. Originality/value – The contribution of this paper to the existent literature relies both on its approach and on its theoretical framework. Differing from the majority of the studies on the internationalization of companies from emerging economies, this paper emphasizes the importance of industrial policies to support OFDI and the developmental dimension of these policies. The authors believe that the theoretical framework developed here can be extended to further analysis of OFDI policies from other emerging economies. Policymakers may also benefit from the conclusions of this research.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management

Reference59 articles.

1. Aiginger, K. (2007), “Industrial policy: a dying breed or a re-emerging phoenix”, Journal of Industrial, Competition and Trade, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 297-323.

2. Alem, A. and Cavancanti, C. (2005), “O BNDES e o apoio à internacionalização das empresas brasileiras: algumas reflexões”, Revista do BNDES, Vol. 12 No. 24, pp. 43-76.

3. Amsden, A. (2001), The Rise of the Rest, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

4. Amsden, A. (2009), “Does ownership matter? POE vs. FOE in the developing world”, in Ramamurti, , R. , Singh, and J. (Eds), Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 64-78.

5. Amsden, A. (2012), “National companies or foreign affiliates: whose contribution to growth is greater?”, Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment, Columbia FDI Perspectives No. 60, New York.

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3