The location of comprehensive income reporting – does it pass the financial analyst revision test?

Author:

Banks Louis,Hodgson Allan,Russell Mark

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to test whether a change in the reporting location of income, and other comprehensive income (OCI) components, in a statement of comprehensive income (SoCI) under International Financial Reporting Standards affects their value-relevance and use by financial analysts. Design/methodology/approach The study tests the associations between CI, OCI, share returns and financial analyst forecast revisions. Findings Results show that comprehensive income is less value-relevant than net income, regardless of reporting location. Changing the reporting location of OCI components to the SoCI does not provide incremental improvement for financial analysts or stock prices. Finally, the paper finds that analysts use OCI components to revise forecasts. Originality/value The paper addresses the question of which OCI components should be reported, and the importance of reporting location. The paper extends the examination of OCI components to financial analysts as expert financial report users.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Finance,Accounting

Reference63 articles.

1. Market microstructure and securities values: evidence from the Tel Aviv stock exchange;Journal of Financial Economics,1997

2. Is comprehensive income useful?;Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics,2006

3. Stock market synchronicity – an alternative approach to assessing the information impact of australian IFRS;Accounting and Finance,2012

4. Bradbury, M.E. and Khan, S. (2012), “Risk relevance of comprehensive income”, Working Paper, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2192671 (accessed 1 October 2016).

5. The impact of statutory sanctions on the level and information content of voluntary corporate disclosure;Abacus,1999

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3