Author:
Saveliev Anton,Zhurenkov Denis
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to review and analyze how the development and utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies for social responsibility are defined in the national AI strategies of the USA, Russia and China.
Design/methodology/approach
The notion of responsibility concerning AI is currently not legally defined by any country in the world. The authors of this research are going to use the methodology, based on Luciano Floridi’s Unified framework of five principles for AI in society, to determine how social responsibility is implemented in the AI strategies of the USA, Russia and China.
Findings
All three strategies for the development of AI in the USA, Russia and China, as evaluated in the paper, contain some or other components aimed at achieving public responsibility and responsible use of AI. The Unified framework of five principles for AI in society, developed by L. Floridi, can be used as a viable assessment tool to determine at least in general terms how social responsibility is implied and implemented in national strategic documents in the field of AI. However, authors of the paper call for further development in the field of mutually recognizable ethical models for socially beneficial AI.
Practical implications
This study allows us to better understand the linkages, overlaps and differences between modern philosophy of information, AI-ethics, social responsibility and government regulation. The analysis provided in this paper can serve as a basic blueprint for future attempts to define how social responsibility is understood and implied by government decision-makers.
Originality/value
The analysis provided in the paper, however general and empirical it may be, is a first-time example of how the Unified framework of five principles for AI in society can be applied as an assessment tool to determine social responsibility in AI-related official documents.
Subject
Computer Science (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Theoretical Computer Science,Control and Systems Engineering,Engineering (miscellaneous)
Reference60 articles.
1. How the GDPR will change the world;European Data Protection Law Review,2016
2. Artificial morality: top-down, bottom-up, and hybrid approaches;Ethics and Information Technology,2005
3. Anderson, R.J. and Sherrock, W.W. (2013), “Ethical algorithms: a brief comment on an extensive”, available at: www.sharrockandanderson.co.uk/wp-content/ (accessed 03 September 2020).
4. Artificial intelligence and autonomous devices in legal;Tr. SPIIRAN,2017
5. On some issues of the theoretical basis for the development;Law,2017
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献