Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to show evidence of the divergence of welfare outcomes in the European Union (EU) during the economic crisis, which made the European social model fail, and the convergence among European countries halt. This study reviews Sapir’s model for classifying European welfare state systems and adapts it to the new reality, taking into account Europe 2020 targets on poverty reduction and employment growth.
Design/methodology/approach
Two variables are used in the application of Sapir’s graphical analysis to European social models: the employment rate as efficiency indicator, and the people At Risk Of Poverty and/or Exclusion rate as equity indicator. Both efficiency and equity are present in Europe 2020 targets. In addition, a cluster analysis is applied.
Findings
The division of EU member states into four geopolitical social models has proved to be dynamic, changing in the period under analysis. As a consequence of the economic crisis and the fiscal consolidation, efficiency and equity levels across the EU are polarised between the Mediterranean and the Nordic models.
Originality/value
This paper shows the effects of the economic crisis in the EU, analysing the evolution between 2008 and 2014, and incorporating Eastern Europe new member states into the analysis.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science
Reference50 articles.
1. Global welfare regimes;Global Social Policy,2010
2. The European social model and the United States;European Union Politics,2006
3. La Estrategia de la Unión Europea de Lucha contra la Pobreza,2014
4. Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report;Journal of European Social Policy,2002
5. Ayala, L. (2008), “Desigualdad, Pobreza y Privación”, in Renes, V. (Ed.), VI Informe sobre Exclusión y Desarrollo Social en España, Fundación FOESSA, Madrid, pp. 87-171.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Gender equality models in the European Union;International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy;2022-06-02
2. The Learning Economy Regime;Journal of the Knowledge Economy;2021-02-12