Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to formulate a conceptually and empirically grounded new understanding of childcare arrangements for cross-national and longitudinal micro-level empirical research by drawing on theoretical discussions about the social, spatial and temporal dimensions of embodied childcare and empirical data in the form of parental narratives from a Romanian qualitative study.
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper builds on a critique of an extensive body of empirical literature on the micro-level organisation of childcare and the thematic analysis of in-depth interviews with Romanian parents. The paper combines a critical literature review with findings from a qualitative study on childcare.
Findings
– The paper formulates a new understanding of household-level childcare arrangements that is context-insensitive, yet reflects the social, spatial and temporal concerns that the organisation of embodied childcare often raises. The paper expands on six real-life care arrangements in Romanian households represented as different combinations of care encounters.
Research limitations/implications
– As the paper draws on parental narratives from a single country, Romania, the mapping of childcare arrangements in other jurisdictions and/or at different times would strengthen the case for the proposed understanding of care arrangements as a valuable tool to represent, compareand contrast household-level care routines.
Originality/value
– The idea that parents (especially mothers) make work-care decisions in the light of what is best for their child has been widely documented. However, taxonomies of care arrangements have failed to reflect this. The proposed conceptualisation of childcare arrangements addresses this issue by articulating a conceptually coherent approach to developing empirically grounded childcare typologies that “travel well” cross-nationally and over time.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science
Reference63 articles.
1. Ansari, A.
and
Winsler, A.
(2013), “Stability and sequence of center-based and family childcare: links with low-income children’s school readiness”,
Children and Youth Services Review
, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 358-366.
2. Anttonen, A.
and
Zechner, M.
(2011), “Theorising care and care work”, in
Pfau-Effinger, B.
and
Rostgaard, T.
(Eds),
Care Between Work and Welfare in European Societies
, Palgrave MacMillan – RECWOWE, Basingstoke, pp. 15-34.
3. Baldock, J.
and
Hadlow, J.
(2004), “Managing the family: productivity, scheduling and the male veto”,
Social Policy & Administration
, Vol. 38 No. 6, pp. 706-720.
4. Beaujot, R.
(1997), “Parental preferences for work and childcare”,
Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques
, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 275-288.
5. Bonizzoni, P.
(2014), “Immigrant working mothers reconciling work and childcare: the experience of Latin American and eastern European women in milan”,
Social Politics
, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 194-217.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献