Abstract
PurposeWhile current scholarship on innovation typically examines its antecedents, the purpose of this paper is to provide a more complete account by advocating for social impacts as a critical component of the sociological study of innovation.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopts a conceptual approach to illustrate the ways in which innovation may generate unequitable outcomes. The authors illustrate the purpose of the paper by discussing strategically selected examples that are intended to reflect prominent themes and topics in the relevant literature.FindingsThe analysis suggests that while innovation yields many positive benefits, pervasive narratives about its virtues can be overstated when, in fact, innovation may generate adverse effects for particular social groups by reproducing or exacerbating inequality. The authors provide a more complete account of innovation by naming social impacts as a critical component of its sociological study and discussing examples that illustrate how innovation can produce disadvantageous effects by race, gender and social class. The authors move forward the discussion of social impacts by elaborating conditions in which innovation is likely to reproduce the status quo as well as ameliorate negative impacts.Originality/valueWhile many studies have explained the conditions that foster innovation, this study pushes the boundaries of the study of innovation – a timely topic for practitioners and scholars in the fields of not only sociology, but management, education and public policy. Accordingly, we move forward the discussion of the social impacts of innovation by identifying the ways in which innovation is likely to reproduce structural inequalities.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science
Reference131 articles.
1. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: a theory of gendered organizations;Gender and Society,1990
2. Measuring trends in leisure: the allocation of time over five decades;The Quarterly Journal of Economics,2007
3. Alvarez, M., Bailey, D. and Katz, J. (2008), “The effect of voter identification laws on turnout”, California Institute of Technology Social Science Working Paper 1267R, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1084598.
4. The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market;The American Economic Review,2013
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献