Towards innovative building maintenance

Author:

Wood Brian

Abstract

PurposeBuilding maintenance is not sexy – yet it is big business, arguably more than new‐build. It is under‐researched. Received wisdom from the 1960s and 1970s is that reactive maintenance is undesirable; planned preventive maintenance (PPM) is “the answer”. That paradigm fails to put people at the centre. Times have moved on. The thinking here challenges the public‐sector “think big’ command economy based approach, and aims to examine new ways ahead. The purpose of this paper is to summarise a range of new approaches and identify common threads. People are an organisation's greatest asset; the maintenance and enhancement of their working and living environments and their wellbeing deserve serious attention.Design/methodology/approachThe research is based on semi‐structured interviews with maintenance and facility managers in organisations noted for their tendencies to innovate in their core business. The paper aims to assist maintenance and facility managers to review their building maintenance priorities in relation to user wants and needs.FindingsWhile the study is insufficient at this stage to support wholesale change in practice to any one new approach, a professional approach to the expenditure of considerable sums on building maintenance suggests that appropriate time should be spent in developing and evaluating alternative approaches.Originality/valueCalls for a complete re‐think on the approach taken to maintenance.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference19 articles.

1. Audit Commission (1986), Improving Council House Maintenance, HMSO, London.

2. Barbour Index (1998), The Building Maintenance and Refurbishment Market: Summary, Barbour Index, Windsor.

3. British Standards Institution (1964), BS 3811: 1964: Maintenance Management Terms in Terotechnology, British Standards Institution, Milton Keynes.

4. British Standards Institution (1991), BS 4778: 1991: Quality Vocabulary: Availability, Reliability and Maintainability Term, part 3, Section 3.2, 1991, British Standards Institution, Milton Keynes.

5. Clements‐Croome, D. (Ed.) (2000), Creating the Productive Workplace, E. & F.N. Spon, London.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3