Experiences of prison officers on a Lifer Psychologically Informed Planned Environment

Author:

Bond Natalie,Gemmell Linda

Abstract

Purpose – Psychologically Informed Planned Environments (PIPEs) provide a pathway facility for offenders with complex needs, such as personality disorder; to maintain and develop the progress made on offending behaviour programmes (Ministry of Justice and Department of Health, 2012). The purpose of this paper is to explore the experiences of prison officers who work on a PIPE in a Lifer prison. Design/methodology/approach – Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis was used to explore the experiences of five prison officers working on a PIPE in a Lifer prison. Findings – Main themes identified were labelled “Role Conflict”, “Growth”, “Relationships” and “Impact”. A rich and detailed account of the experience of the “voyage of discovery” and the personal challenges, costs and rewards of the PIPE work was achieved. Research limitations/implications – Limitations include the small number of participants, limited focus of the researchers, both Forensic Psychologists, and the uniqueness of the context, a Lifer prison. Limitations might be addressed by future research that could expand on the current findings. Implications for future research include further exploration of the psychological impact of the work, dynamics within the PIPE and the value of attachment theory in work with personality disordered offenders. Implications for future policy and practice concern training, support and the development of new PIPEs. Originality/value – The research adds a rich account of what it is like for these prison officers to work on a PIPE in a Lifer prison. The experiences shared reveal the personal challenge, costs and rewards of the work through which ideas to develop the staff, residents and the PIPE model emerged.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Pshychiatric Mental Health

Reference23 articles.

1. Campling, P. , Davies, S. and Farquharson, G. (2004), From Toxic Institutions to Therapeutic Environments: Residential Settings in Mental Health Services, The Royal College of Psychiatrists, London.

2. Cullen, E. (1994), “Grendon: the therapeutic prison that works”, Therapeutic Communities, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 301-11.

3. Cullen, E. and Miller, A. (2010), “Dovegate therapeutic community: bid, birth, growth and survival”, in Shuker, R. and Sullivan, E. (Eds), Grendon and the Emergence of Forensic Therapeutic Communities: Development in Research and Practice, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp. 25-44.

4. Davies, S. (2004), “Toxic institutions”, in Campling, P. , Davies, S. and Farquharson G. (Eds), From Toxic Institutions to Therapeutic Environments: Residential Settings in Mental Health Services, The Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, pp. 12-9.

5. Elliot, K.A. and Daley, D. (2012), “Stress, coping and psychological well-being among forensic health care professionals”, Legal and Criminological Psychology, doi:10 1111/j.2044-8333.2012.02045.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3