Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the relationships between changes in water efficiency, profit and risk for firms in the global Consumer Packaged Goods industry. This study also aims to consider the moderating effect of operational efficiency on those relationships.Design/methodology/approachUsing a sample of 155 firms with annual corporate social performance and financial performance data from Bloomberg for the years 2010–2019, this study employs first-differencing panel regression models to obtain our results.FindingsThis study finds strong evidence that operational efficiency moderates the relationships between water efficiency, profit and risk. For operationally efficient firms, increasing water efficiency increases profit and reduces risk. But for firms that are not operationally efficient, this study finds the opposite effects. These findings suggest a threshold level of operational efficiency that firms should achieve before they can reap financial benefits from increases in water efficiency.Originality/valueDespite the increasing importance of water efficiency as a measure of corporate social performance, its effects on financial performance are not well studied. The relationship between operational efficiency and water efficiency has also not been examined. This work provides empirical evidence to better understand these important relationships. The major implication for managers is that operational efficiency is a foundational capability that should be developed before focusing on efforts to improve water efficiency. For operationally efficient firms, improvements in water efficiency can be an important mechanism to increase profitability and reduce risk.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference88 articles.
1. Adriaens, P., Sun, K. and Gao, R. (2014), “Bridging physical and financial business water risk: waterVaR and waterBeta metrics for equity and portfolio risk assessment”, Ross School of Business Working Paper No. 1237.
2. Does environmental management improve financial performance? A meta-analytical review;Organization and Environment,2013
3. Corporate social responsibility and stock market performance;Academy of Management Journal,1978
4. Predicting railroad bankruptcies in America;The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science,1973
5. Efficiency in manufacturing and the need for global competition,1995
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献