The function of food refusal in male prisons and custodial environments. A rapid evidence assessment (REA)

Author:

Adlam Jessica,Powell Gemma

Abstract

Purpose This rapid evidence assessment (REA) study aims to synthesise what is known about food refusal within male prison populations to aid a better understanding of why this occurs. By looking at the various functions of food refusal for this population, it is hoped that professionals can better support prisoners’ needs in this area. Design/methodology/approach A rapid review of available data within the published literature was completed. Searches were conducted on two databases (PsychInfo and MedLine), and a total of 328 articles were screened using a three-stage process. This resulted in 13 articles being identified for the final sample, which were reviewed and synthesised into themes by looking for commonalities. Findings Five themes were identified: “to protest”, “to achieve goals or demands”, “to manage interpersonal difficulties with prison/custodial staff”, “to end life” and “mental health and personality disorder”. The findings appear to suggest that food refusal in this context may be predominantly driven by a need to communicate or gain control. Practical implications To help prevent and cease food refusal, it will be beneficial for prison staff to use approaches that support prisoners feeling a sense of fairness, transparency, control and autonomy, as well as problem-solving skills and establishing a sense of purpose and motivation. Originality/value This REA confirmed there is a lack of good-quality research into the functions of food refusal among prisoners in the UK. Future research should involve contact with prisoners who have engaged in food refusal to understand motivations firsthand.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Psychiatry and Mental health,Applied Psychology,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference33 articles.

1. Ethical and legal consideration of prisoner’s hunger strike in Serbia;Journal of Forensic Sciences,2011

2. AJOB case presentation: hunger strike or suicide by starvation: is force feeding a prisoner ethical?;American Journal of Bioethics;The American Journal of Bioethics,2014

3. Force-feeding hunger-striking prisoners: a framework for analysis;University of Florida Law Review,1983

4. Mental health in prison: a trauma perspective on importation and deprivation;International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory,2012

5. Formulating a researchable question: a critical step for facilitating good clinical research;Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and AIDS,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3