Author:
Boon‐itt Sakun,Yew Wong Chee
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to test the moderating effects of technological and demand uncertainties on the relationship between supply chain integration and customer delivery performance.Design/methodology/approachBased on a survey questionnaire with 151 participants in the Thai automotive industry supply chain, hierarchical regressions are used to test the moderating effects.FindingsInternal and supplier integration, but not customer integration, were positively associated with customer delivery performance. Technological and demand uncertainties were found to moderate the relationships between internal integration and customer delivery performance, and supplier integration and customer delivery performance.Research limitations/implicationsThe moderating effects of technological and demand uncertainties in the Thai automotive just‐in‐time (JIT) environment are explained. This research contributes to the development of a contingency theory of supply chain integration suggesting that the impacts of supply chain integration on customer delivery performance vary under different levels of technological and demand uncertainties.Practical implicationsManagers recognize the diminishing effects of internal integration and supplier integration under demand uncertainty, and the increasing effect of supplier integration under high technological uncertainty.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the supply chain management literature by clarifying the moderating effects of technological and demand uncertainties on the relationship between supply chain integration and customer delivery performance.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Transportation
Reference93 articles.
1. Aiken, L.S. and West, S.G. (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
2. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1988), “Structural equation modelling in practices: a review and recommended two‐step approach”, Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 103, pp. 411‐23.
3. Armstrong, J.S. and Overton, T.S. (1997), “Estimating non‐response bias in mail surveys”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 396‐402.
4. Bagozzi, R.P., Youjae, Y. and Phillips, L.W. (1991), “Assessing construct validity in organizational research”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, pp. 421‐58.
5. Bandyopadhyay, J.K. and Sprague, D.A. (2003), “Total quality management in an automotive supply chain in the United States”, International Journal of Management, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 17‐22.
Cited by
113 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献