Comparative analysis of the carbon footprints of conventional and online retailing

Author:

Edwards Julia B.,McKinnon Alan C.,Cullinane Sharon L.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to focus on the carbon intensity of “last mile” deliveries (i.e. deliveries of goods from local depots to the home) and personal shopping trips.Design/methodology/approachSeveral last mile scenarios are constructed for the purchase of small, non‐food items, such as books, CDs, clothing, cameras and household items. Official government data, operational data from a large logistics service provider, face‐to‐face and telephone interviews with company managers and realistic assumptions derived from the literature form the basis of the calculations. Allowance has been made for home delivery failures, “browsing” trips to the shops and the return of unwanted goods.FindingsOverall, the research suggests that, while neither home delivery nor conventional shopping has an absolute CO2 advantage, on average, the home delivery operation is likely to generate less CO2 than the typical shopping trip. Nevertheless, CO2 emissions per item for intensive/infrequent shopping trips by bus could match online shopping/home delivery.Research limitations/implicationsThe number of items purchased per shopping trip, the choice of travel mode and the willingness to combine shopping with other activities and to group purchases into as few shopping trips or online transactions as possible are shown to be critical factors. Online retailers and home delivery companies could also apply measures (e.g. maximising drop densities and increasing the use of electric vehicles) to enhance the CO2 efficiency of their logistical operations and gain a clearer environmental advantage.Practical implicationsBoth consumers and suppliers need to be made more aware of the environmental implications of their respective purchasing behaviour and distribution methods so that potential CO2 savings can be made.Originality/valueThe paper offers insights into the carbon footprints of conventional and online retailing from a “last mile” perspective.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Transportation

Reference67 articles.

1. Abukhader, S.M. and Jönson, G. (2003), “The environmental implications of electronic commerce: a critical review and framework for future investigation”, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 460‐76.

2. Agatz, N., Fleischmann, M. and van Nunen, J. (2006), “e‐Fulfilment and multi‐channel distribution: a review”, Report Series Research in Management Working Paper No. ERS‐2006‐042‐LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management, Rotterdam.

3. Beveridge, I. (2007), “Personal communications”, meeting with Beveridge Associates, 19 July.

4. Beveridge, I. (2009), “Personal communications”, 3 March.

5. Brooks, C.M., Kaufmann, P.J. and Lichtenstein, D.R. (2008), “Trip chaining behaviour in multi‐destination shopping trips: a field experiment and laboratory replication”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 84 No. 1, pp. 29‐38.

Cited by 224 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3