Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future directions

Author:

Carter Craig R.,Liane Easton P.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to conduct a systematic review of the sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) literature in the principal logistics and supply chain management journals, across a 20‐year time frame.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use a systematic literature review methodology. This methodology allows for the minimization of researcher bias and the maximization of reliability and replicability. The study's empirical validity is further enhanced by demonstrating high levels of inter‐coder reliability across families of codes.FindingsThe field of SSCM has evolved from a perspective and investigation of standalone research in social and environmental areas; through a corporate social responsibility perspective; to the beginnings of the convergence of perspectives of sustainability as the triple bottom line and the emergence of SSCM as a theoretical framework. While the SSCM research has become more theoretically rich and methodologically rigorous, there are numerous opportunities for further advancing theory, methodology, and the managerial relevance of future inquiries.Research limitations/implicationsThe trends and gaps identified through our analysis allow us to develop a cogent agenda to guide future SSCM research.Practical implicationsThe current perspectives of SSCM hold important implications for managers, by directing limited resources toward projects which intersect environmental and/or social performance, and economic performance.Originality/valueThe paper provides a systematic, rigorous, and methodologically valid review of the evolution of empirical SSCM research across a 20‐year time period.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Transportation

Reference50 articles.

1. Belk, R.W., Sherry, J.F. Jr and Wallendorf, M. (1988), “A naturalistic inquiry into buyer and seller behavior at a swap meet”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 449‐70.

2. Belk, R.W., Wallendorf, M. and Sherry, J.F. Jr (1989), “The sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: theodicy on the odyssey”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 1‐38.

3. Brown, K.A., Willis, P.G. and Prussia, G.E. (2000), “Predicting safe employee behavior in the steel industry: development and test of a sociotechnial model”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 445‐65.

4. Carroll, A.B. (1979), “A three‐dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 497‐505.

5. Carroll, A.B. (1991), “The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders”, Business Horizons, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 39‐48.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3