Author:
Rajendra Boopathy Vijayanand,Sriraman Anantharaman,G. Arumaikkannu
Abstract
Purpose
The present work aims in presenting the energy absorbing capability of different combination stacking of multiple materials, namely, Vero White and Tango Plus, under static and dynamic loading conditions.
Design/methodology/approach
Honeycomb structures with various multi-material stackings are fabricated using PolyJet 3D printing technique. From the static and dynamic test results, the structure having the better energy absorbing capability is identified.
Findings
It is found that from the various stacking combinations of multiple materials, the five-layered (5L) sandwich multi-material honeycomb structure has better energy absorbing capability.
Practical implications
This multi-material combination with a honeycomb structure can be used in the application of crash resistance components such as helmet, knee guard, car bumper, etc.
Originality/value
Through experimental work, various multi-material honeycomb structures and impact resistance of single material clearly indicated the inability to absorb impact loads which experiences a maximum force of 5,055.24 N, whereas the 5L sandwich multi-material honeycomb structure experiences a minimum force of 1,948.17 N, which is 38.5 per cent of the force experienced by the single material. Moreover, in the case of compressive resistance, 2L sandwich multi-material honeycomb structure experiences a maximum force of 5,887.5 N, whereas 5L sandwich multi-material honeycomb structure experiences a minimum force of 2,410 N, which is 40.9 per cent of the force experienced by two-layered (2L) sandwich multi-material honeycomb structure. In this study, the multi-material absorbed most of the input energy and experienced minimum force in both compressive and impact loads, thus showing its energy absorbing capability and hence its utility for structures that experience impact and compressive loads. A maximum force is required to deform the single and 2L material in terms of impact and compressive load, respectively, under maximum stiffness conditions.
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Mechanical Engineering
Reference21 articles.
1. Simulation of vehicular frontal crash test;International Journal of Applied Research in Mechanical Engineering (IJARME),2012
2. Standard terminology for additive manufacturing coordinate systems and test methodologies;American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard F2921-11,2012
3. ASTM F2792-10 standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies;ASTM,2018
4. Static and dynamic properties of high-density metal honeycombs;International Journal of Impact Engineering ISSN: PII: S0734-743X(97)00040-7,1998
5. Design and manufacturing issues in the development of light weight solution for a vehicle frontal bumper;Procedia Engineering,2014
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献