Motivation and incentives in relational contracts

Author:

Darrington Joel W.,Howell Gregory A.

Abstract

PurposeLean projects seek to optimise the project rather than its parts and to maximize value to the customer. To better align the behaviour of project participants with a Lean project delivery model, the purpose of this paper is to argue for compensation structures that better address the economic and non‐economic motives that impact project performance.Design/methodology/approachSocial science research increasingly shows that non‐economic human motives play a key role in job performance and that they interact in complicated ways with economic incentives. By reviewing and extrapolating from relevant literature, this paper explores certain key non‐economic human motives and their impact on project performance, how these non‐economic motives interact with economic incentives, and strategies for structuring effective incentives.FindingsThe paper identifies certain contract incentive principles that the authors believe should promote non‐economic motivation.Research limitations/implicationsThe paper provides a starting point for further research regarding compatibility of incentives with non‐economic motives on Lean projects. In particular, more research is needed on the applicability of the social science findings to corporate entities.Practical implicationsThe paper suggests that traditional compensation systems are ill‐suited to project‐optimised behaviour.Originality/valueThis paper provides important insight into the problems of traditional compensation systems for construction projects and offers both concepts and strategies that could better align economic incentives with project‐optimised behaviour.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Accounting,Business and International Management

Reference15 articles.

1. Ballard, G. and Howell, G. (2005), “Relational contracting and Lean construction”, Lean Const. J., Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 1‐4.

2. Bowles, S. (2008a), A Cooperative Species, 2008 Stanislaw Ulam Memorial Lecture Series, Lecture 1, Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, available at: www.santafe.edu/research/videos/play/?id=5183819e‐a5fb‐11dd‐99c1‐4da4dd40736c.

3. Bowles, S. (2008b), Machiavelli's Mistake, 2008 Stanislaw Ulam Memorial Lecture Series, Lecture 3, Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, available at: www.santafe.edu/research/videos/play/?id=51ac8d71‐a5fb‐11dd‐99c1‐4da4dd40736c.

4. Bowles, S. (2008c), “Policies designed for self‐interested citizens may undermine ‘the moral sentiments’: evidence from economic experiments”, Science, Vol. 320 No. 5883, pp. 1605‐9.

5. Darrington, J. (2010), “Addressing human motivation in construction contracts”, Calif. Constructor, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 18‐19.

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Managing Actions Through Incentives, Motives, and Abilities;Studies in Systems, Decision and Control;2024

2. Factors affecting the personal knowledge management amongst sales officers in Indonesian leading automotive companies;International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies;2023

3. Synthesis of Relational Practices for PPP Contracts and Their Linkage with Governance Mechanisms;Journal of Construction Engineering and Management;2022-12

4. Results From the Delphi Study;Construction Supply Chain Management in the Fourth Industrial Revolution Era;2022-09-23

5. Success in collaborative construction through the lens of project delivery elements;Built Environment Project and Asset Management;2022-08-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3