Future challenges in day‐care centre food services: will benchmarking help?

Author:

Hunter W.,Lumbers M.,Raats M.

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this study is to identify the methods used by providers to evaluate their food services and identify elements of their service that would benefit from adopting a benchmarking system.Design/methodology/approachIn‐depth interviews were conducted with 26 food services providers and key informants in day‐care settings in Surrey.FindingsFew providers formally evaluated their service provision and most had not considered benchmarking their services against other food service providers. Factors such as food variety, food quality, cost and environment have been identified as issues that could be benchmarked and may benefit from the adoption of this process.Research limitations/implicationsThe study was conducted only in one country – in the UK – further research is needed into the evaluation practices of other local authorities. The benchmarking model that has been developed by the authors needs to be applied in a food service setting to establish its usefulness to food service managers.Practical implicationsA model has been developed from the outcome of this research, which could aid evaluation processes for food service providers to identify aspects of the service in need of improvement.Originality/valueThere has been little research conducted on the evaluation of food service provision for older people, especially for congregate meals. This paper provides a model, that food service providers may find useful, to identify areas of their food services that are suitable for benchmarking.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference38 articles.

1. Baker, E.B. and Wellman, N.S. (2005), “Nutrition concerns in discharge planning for older adults: a need for multidisciplinary collaboration”, Journal of the American Dietetic Association, Vol. 105 No. 4, pp. 603‐7.

2. City of Edinburgh Social Work Department (1999), A Best Value Review of Meals on Wheels, available at: http://download.edinburgh.gov.uk/SocialWork/_1999__Meals_On_Wheels.pdf (accessed 11 February 2005).

3. City of Edinburgh Social Work Department (2001), “Best value review of local authority day care for older people”, available at: http://download.edinburgh.gov.uk/SocialWork/_2001__Day_Care___Allied_Services.pdf (accessed 11 February 2006).

4. Commission for Social Care Inspection (2004), Inspection of Social Care Services for Older People, Commission for Social Care Inspection, London.

5. Commission for Social Care Inspection (2005), Annual Report and Accounts 2004‐05, The Stationery Office, London.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3