Performance measurement and adoption of balanced scorecards

Author:

Lilian Chan Yee‐Ching

Abstract

To deal with financial constraints and increasing demand on accountability, government administrators have begun implementing modern management tools in their organizations. The balanced scorecard, a performance and strategic management system, has been adopted in for‐profit organizations with success and its application in the government sector is explored in this study. Results of a survey of municipal governments in the USA and Canada show that there is limited use of the balanced scorecard. Most municipal governments, however, have developed measures to assess their organizations' financial, customer satisfaction, operating efficiency, innovation and change, and employee performance. Respondent administrators, in general, have confidence in the quality of the performance measures and about half reported that these measures were used to support various management functions. The respondent administrators also have a good understanding of the balanced scorecard and the implementers are positive about their experience.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference26 articles.

1. Amir, E. and Lev, B. (1996), “Value‐relevance of non‐financial information: the wireless communications industry”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 22, pp. 3‐30.

2. Atkinson, A.A. and McCrindell, J.Q. (1997), “Strategic performance measurement in government”, CMA Magazine, April, pp. 20‐3.

3. Brewer, P. (2002), “Putting strategy into the balanced scorecard”, Strategic Finance, January, pp. 44‐52.

4. Chow, C.W., Ganulin, D., Haddad, K. and Williamson, J. (1998), “The balanced scorecard: a potent tool for energizing and focusing health‐care organization management”, Journal of Health‐care Management, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 63‐80.

5. Foltin, C. (1999), “State and local government performance: it's time to measure up”, The Government Accountants' Journal, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 40‐6.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3