Author:
Ahmad Yusuf,Broussine Mike
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of the paper is to report on the results of an inquiry into the possible reasons why many public service managers and leaders across six European countries report a loss of personal agency and suggests a possible pedagogic response to this.Design/methodology/approachThe nature of agency is explored with reference to theory, and the methodology for the study – heuristic action inquiry – is outlined. The paper argues that spaces within postgraduate education are needed to facilitate managers' critical reflection and working with anxiety, and the article goes on to outline how public services leadership programmes can seek to achieve this.FindingsThe paper suggests that programmes need to work both with the cognitive and affective domains, and to find ways of exploring within the curriculum how managers may begin more to see their roles as potentially key actors in the policy‐making process rather than as passive recipients of policy imperatives received from above. The loss of agency experienced by public servants in several European countries suggests that MPA programmes and the like need to work with students' anxieties in a contained way.Originality/valueSome trends within contemporary public services that lie behind anxiety and loss of agency are identified, including high emphasis on performance targets, centrally driven change, financial stringency, loss of professional and organisation identities, a perpetuation of a “private is best” governmental ideology, and contradictory accountability structures.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference23 articles.
1. Bandura, A. (2001), “Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 52, pp. 1‐26.
2. Boud, D., Keogh, R. and Walker, D. (1985), Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, Kogan Page, London.
3. Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Broussine, M. (2003), “Leading and managing at the boundary – perspectives created by joined up working”, Local Government Studies, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 128‐38.
5. Dane, E. and Pratt, M.G. (2007), “Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 33‐54.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献