Regionalisation, “virtual” spaces and “real” territories

Author:

Herrschel Tassilo

Abstract

PurposeThis paper seeks to examine evidence of new forms of regionalisation in both theory and practice, and the relationship between the two. In so doing, it aims to demonstrate the essential complementarity, rather than widely argued alternativeness, of both conventional and new forms of inter‐local collaboration at the regional level. The paper also seeks to demonstrate the importance of institutional and local legacies for the nature of regionalisation.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on interviews by the author with economic policy makers in several city regions in Europe and North America over the last three years, and the results of a series of workshops involving many of these very policy makers.FindingsThere is growing evidence of new forms of inter‐local region building being adopted by policy makers in response to a perceived need to maintain/improve economic competitiveness. Concerns about “giving away” powers and resources when engaging in usual conventional, formalised, fixed forms of regionalisation have created reluctance among many local actors to do so. The need to be more responsive to rapidly changing economic conditions, coupled to a realisation of the need for concerted action, have encouraged economic policy makers to adopt new, more experimental forms of region‐wide collaboration.Practical implicationsThe findings not only challenge established practices and a conventional focus on planning and technocratic views of “regions”, but also raise questions about the prevalent regulation theory‐inspired arguments in academic debate. Instead, “virtual regionalisation” seems to open new opportunities for defining meaning and operation of “regions” and “regionalism”, with the different backgrounds in Europe and North America allowing a somewhat more “open mind” in the latter than the former.Originality/valueThe paper illustrates that in many regions in Europe and North America there is now a multitude of actors and organisations seeking to promote regional competitiveness and growth.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference29 articles.

1. Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (1995), “Globalisation, institutional ‘thickness’ and the local economy”, in Healey, P., Cameron, S. and Davoudi, S. (Eds), Managing Cities: The New Urban Context, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 91‐108.

2. Brenner, N. (2002), “Decoding the newest ‘metropolitan regionalism’ in the USA: a critical overview”, Cities, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 3‐21.

3. Cox, K. (2004), “Globalization and the politics of local and regional development: the question of convergence”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 179‐94.

4. Frey, M. (2005), “Concepts of region in international history, concepts of region in international history”, in Frey, M., Hönnighausen, J. and Peacock, J. (Eds), Regionalism in the Age of Globalism: Concepts of Regionalism, University of Wisconsin‐Madison, Madison, WI.

5. Gualini, E. (2004), “Regionalization as ‘experimental regionalism’: the rescaling of territorial policy making in Germany”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 329‐53.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Regional Solutions for Rural and Urban Challenges;State and Local Government Review;2019-12

2. Balancing territorial identities;International Marketing Review;2019-09-09

3. Reallabore als Rahmen transformativer und transdisziplinärer Forschung: Ziele und Designprinzipien;Transdisziplinär und transformativ forschen;2018

4. An emerging North Sea macro-region? Implications for Scotland;Journal of Baltic Studies;2017-04-26

5. Attempts at Regional Mobilisation in a Unitary State: Two Decades of Learning and Unlearning;Revolutionizing Economic and Democratic Systems;2016-11-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3