Regionalisation, “virtual” spaces and “real” territories
Author:
Herrschel Tassilo
Abstract
PurposeThis paper seeks to examine evidence of new forms of regionalisation in both theory and practice, and the relationship between the two. In so doing, it aims to demonstrate the essential complementarity, rather than widely argued alternativeness, of both conventional and new forms of inter‐local collaboration at the regional level. The paper also seeks to demonstrate the importance of institutional and local legacies for the nature of regionalisation.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on interviews by the author with economic policy makers in several city regions in Europe and North America over the last three years, and the results of a series of workshops involving many of these very policy makers.FindingsThere is growing evidence of new forms of inter‐local region building being adopted by policy makers in response to a perceived need to maintain/improve economic competitiveness. Concerns about “giving away” powers and resources when engaging in usual conventional, formalised, fixed forms of regionalisation have created reluctance among many local actors to do so. The need to be more responsive to rapidly changing economic conditions, coupled to a realisation of the need for concerted action, have encouraged economic policy makers to adopt new, more experimental forms of region‐wide collaboration.Practical implicationsThe findings not only challenge established practices and a conventional focus on planning and technocratic views of “regions”, but also raise questions about the prevalent regulation theory‐inspired arguments in academic debate. Instead, “virtual regionalisation” seems to open new opportunities for defining meaning and operation of “regions” and “regionalism”, with the different backgrounds in Europe and North America allowing a somewhat more “open mind” in the latter than the former.Originality/valueThe paper illustrates that in many regions in Europe and North America there is now a multitude of actors and organisations seeking to promote regional competitiveness and growth.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference29 articles.
1. Amin, A. and Thrift, N. (1995), “Globalisation, institutional ‘thickness’ and the local economy”, in Healey, P., Cameron, S. and Davoudi, S. (Eds), Managing Cities: The New Urban Context, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 91‐108. 2. Brenner, N. (2002), “Decoding the newest ‘metropolitan regionalism’ in the USA: a critical overview”, Cities, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 3‐21. 3. Cox, K. (2004), “Globalization and the politics of local and regional development: the question of convergence”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 179‐94. 4. Frey, M. (2005), “Concepts of region in international history, concepts of region in international history”, in Frey, M., Hönnighausen, J. and Peacock, J. (Eds), Regionalism in the Age of Globalism: Concepts of Regionalism, University of Wisconsin‐Madison, Madison, WI. 5. Gualini, E. (2004), “Regionalization as ‘experimental regionalism’: the rescaling of territorial policy making in Germany”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 329‐53.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|