Author:
Aren Selim,Nayman Hamamcı Hatice
Abstract
Purpose
In this study, scales are developed for phantasy and its determinants, which is accepted as an important variable in investment preference with an emotional finance perspective. The scales developed in this framework are narrative, divided mind, group feel, informed herding, uninformed herding and phantasy. In addition, the power of these determinants to explain phantasy was investigated.
Design/methodology/approach
For this purpose, the data was obtained between May 01, 2019 and November 30, 2019 via an online survey with convenience sampling. First, a pilot study consisting of 200 subjects was performed. Then, additional data was collected. The total number of subjects was 648. The authors used IBM SPSS Statistics and AMOS for analysis. Exploratory factor analysis and discriminant analysis were performed. In addition, confirmatory factor analysis was performed after an additional data collection process with structural equation modeling.
Findings
As a result of analyses, the validity and reliability of these scales were ensured statistically. It was also found that divided mind directly affects phantasy, but group feel and narrative indirectly affect by informed herding. The “unknown and new investment” preference, which is accepted as a typical feature of the bubble periods, is modeled with the relevant variables. In this framework, it has been found that the variables that refer individuals to the relevant investment preferences are phantasy, group feel, uninformed herding and divided mind.
Originality/value
The study is unique because of its findings and developed scales. The findings are valuable in that the theoretically alleged relations were also obtained empirically.
Subject
Computer Science (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Theoretical Computer Science,Control and Systems Engineering,Engineering (miscellaneous)
Reference92 articles.
1. Bubbles and crashes;Econometrica,2003
2. Does asymmetric information drive herding? An empirical analysis;Journal of Behavioral Finance,2019
3. The effect of entrepreneurial rhetoric on microlending investment: an examination of the warm-glow effect;Journal of Business Venturing,2013
4. Conceptual framework of emotional finance a new approach to the understanding financial crisis and balloons;Journal of Aksaray University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences,2019
5. Relationship between risk aversion, risky investment intention, investment choices: impact of personality traits and emotion,2020
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献