Chasing criminal wealth: broken expectations for the criminalization of illicit enrichment in Lithuania

Author:

Bikelis Skirmantas

Abstract

Purpose This study aims at elaborating whether the criminalization of illicit enrichment has the potential to be an efficient and well-balanced measure against profiting from serious crime. Design/methodology/approach This study offers a normative analysis of the concept of the criminalization of illicit enrichment, particularly from the perspective of the presumption of innocence. This paper supplements theoretical considerations using Lithuania, where illicit enrichment was criminalized a decade ago, as a case study. It analyses data of all 28 known criminal cases on illicit enrichment that resulted in judgements in Lithuania in 2015–2019. Findings The author concludes that on neither a fundamental nor practical level can the assumption that the criminalization of illicit enrichment efficiently carries out the task for which it was created be supported. Moreover, efforts to implement this legal strategy might unbalance the system of illicit asset recovery measures and obstruct the implementation of other promising legal instruments. Originality/value As very few states with developed democracy and strong rule of law traditions have implemented criminalization of illicit enrichment, there are very few if any empirical data or analysis of practices on this issue that could contribute to the theoretical discussion. This paper aims at contributing to fulfillment of this gap by presenting relevant data and insights from the perspective of Lithuanian criminal justice system.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Public Administration

Reference49 articles.

1. Convention on preventing and combating corruption;African Union,2003

2. Antonenko, L. (2019), “Why Ukraine should abandon efforts to criminalize illicit enrichment”, available .at: www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/why-ukraine-should-abandon-efforts-to-criminalize-illicit-enrichment/ (accessed 26 March 2020).

3. Berger, T. Mathias, M. Morales, M. and Muzila, L. (2012), “On the take: criminalizing illicit enrichment to fight corruption: stolen asset recovery (StAR) initiative”, World Bank Group, Washington, DC, available at http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/958781468339641204/On-the-take-criminalizing-illicit-enrichment-to-fight-corruption (accessed 26 March 2020).

4. Prosecution for illicit enrichment: the Lithuanian perspective;Journal of Money Laundering Control,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3