Abstract
PurposeMore studies are beginning to support the role of distributed, as opposed to solo, leadership in team performance, but distributed leadership (DL) has not always been linked to higher performance. It may need to be co‐ordinated, rather than misaligned or fragmented, and may be most effective in teams performing interdependent tasks. DL has not often been linked to team information processing, however; viewing leadership as involving information management, it is proposed that DL may be linked to higher levels of information exchange and information integration, of both shared and unshared information. A series of research propositions are then developed with the purpose of exploring further the role of DL in team decision making, especially in terms of information exchange and information integration processes in Chinese and Western groups.Design/methodology/approachThe paper derives a number of research propositions from the literature on DL and information processing and applies them to decision making by Chinese and Western teams.FindingsThe paper presents a series of propositions on the factors affecting the effectiveness of DL and possible differences between Chinese and Western teams.Originality/valueThe paper presents a series of propositions about DL and relates the literature on DL to the literature on information processing in an original way.
Reference126 articles.
1. Alvesson, M. and Deetz, S. (2000), Doing Critical Management Research, Sage, London.
2. Avolio, B.J., Jung, D., Murry, W. and Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996), “Building highly developed teams: focusing on shared leadership process, efficacy, trust, and performance”, in Beyerlein, D.A., Johnson, D.A. and Beyerlein, S.T. (Eds), Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 173‐209.
3. Bass, B. (1990), Bass and Stodgill's Handbook of Leadership, The Free Press, New York, NY.
4. Bond, M.H. (1988), “Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: the Rokeach and Chinese value surveys”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 55 No. 6, pp. 1009‐15.
5. Brookes, S. (2006), “Out with the old, in with the new: why excellent public leadership makes a difference to partnership working”, British Journal of Leadership in Public Services, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 52‐64.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献