What is normal profit for power generation?

Author:

Simshauser Paul,Ariyaratnam Jude

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to present a multi-period dynamic power project financing model to produce pragmatic estimates of benchmark wholesale power prices based on the principles of normal profit. This, in turn, can guide policymakers as to whether price spikes or bidding above marginal cost in wholesale electricity markets warrants any investigation at all. One of the seemingly complex areas associated with energy-only wholesale electricity pools is at what point market power abuse is present on the supply side. It should not be this way. If a theoretically robust measure of normal profit exists, identification of potential market power abuse is straightforward. Such a definition readily exists and can be traced back to the ground-breaking work of financial economists in the 1960s. Design/methodology/approach – Using a multi-period dynamic power project model, the authors produce pragmatic and theoretically robust measures of normal profit for project financed plant and plant financed on balance sheet. These model results are then integrated into a static partial equilibrium model of a power system. The model results are in turn used to guide policymaking on generator bidding in energy-only power markets. Findings – Under conditions of perfect plant availability and divisibility with no transmission constraints, energy-only markets result in clearing prices which are not economically viable in the long run. Bidding must, therefore, deviate from strict short-run marginal cost at some stage. To distinguish between quasi-contributions to substantial sunk costs and market power abuse, a pragmatic and robust measure of normal profit is required. Originality/value – This article finds policymakers can be guided by an ex-post analysis of base energy prices against pragmatic estimates for the long-run marginal cost of the base plant, and an ex-ante analysis of call option prices along the forward curve against pragmatic estimates of the carrying cost of the peaking plant.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance

Reference45 articles.

1. ACIL Tasman . (2012), “Fuel cost projections”, Report to AEMO, ACIL Tasman Publication, Brisbane, available at: www.aemo.com.au

2. Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC) . (2013), “Final rule determination: potential generator market power in the NEM,” AEMC Publication, Sydney , available at: www.aemc.gov.au

3. Berrie, T. (1967), “The economics of system planning in bulk electricity supply”, Electrical Review , Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 425-428.

4. Besser, J. , Farr, J. and Tierney, S. (2002), “The political economy of long-term generation adequacy: why an ICAP mechanism is needed as part of standard market design”, Electricity Journal , Vol. 15 No. 7, pp 53-62.

5. Bidwell, M. and Henney, A. (2004), “Will NETA ensure generation adequacy?”, Power UK , Vol. 122, pp. 10-26.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Be Wary of Paying Wounded Bulls – Capacity Markets in Australia's National Electricity Market*;Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy;2022-12-10

2. Australia’s National Electricity Market: An Analysis of the Reform Experience 1998–2021;Revisiting Electricity Market Reforms;2022

3. On the Stability of Energy-Only Markets with Government-Initiated Contracts-for-Differences;Energies;2019-07-03

4. Decarbonisation and wholesale electricity market design;Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics;2018-07-31

5. International Accounting;Managing Global Business;2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3