Abstract
PurposeThis paper investigates the effect of counter-cultural human resources (CCHR) practices on firm performance. Specifically, it investigates the impact of national culture [future orientation (FO), in-group collectivism (I-GC), performance orientation (PO), power distance (PD) and uncertainty avoidance (UA)] on the calculative and collaborative HR practice–firm performance relationship.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses data from the CRANET and GLOBE studies to conduct a multi-level analysis of the impact of national culture on the calculative/collaborative HR–firm performance relationship.FindingsIt finds support for both the CCHR and societal-culture fit (SCF) perspectives of national culture, with FO and I-GC supporting the CCHR perspective and the other culture dimensions aligning more closely with SCF.Originality/valueThese findings empirically validate that CCHR practices can help supplement behaviors lacking in the cultural environment in which organizations operate.
Reference51 articles.
1. Cultural values and definitions of career success;Human Resource Management Journal,2020
2. Does high involvement management improve worker wellbeing?;Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,2012
3. Towards a European model of human-resource management;Journal of International Business Studies,1995
4. Beyond ‘doing as the Romans do’: a review of research on countercultural business practices;Journal of International Business Studies,2021
5. The role of individual cultural traits and proactivity in an organizational setting;Management Research Review,2014
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献