Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a methodology for benchmarking supplier risks through the creation of Bayesian networks. The networks are used to determine a supplier's external, operational, and network risk probability to assess its potential impact on the buyer organization.Design/methodology/approachThe research methodology includes the use of a risk assessment model, surveys, data collection from internal and external sources, and the creation of Bayesian networks used to create risk profiles for the study participants.FindingsIt is found that Bayesian networks can be used as an effective benchmarking tool to assist managers in making decisions regarding current and prospective suppliers based upon their potential impact on the buyer organization, as illustrated through their associated risk profiles.Research limitations/implicationsA potential limitation to the use of the methodology presented in the study is the ability to acquire the necessary data from current and potential suppliers needed to construct the Bayesian networks.Practical implicationsThe methodology presented in this paper can be used by buyer organizations to benchmark supplier risks in supply chain networks, which may lead to adjustments to existing risk management strategies, policies, and tactics.Originality/valueThis paper provides practitioners with an additional tool for benchmarking supplier risks. Additionally, it provides the foundation for future research studies in the use of Bayesian networks for the examination of supplier risks.
Subject
Business and International Management,Strategy and Management
Reference60 articles.
1. Abell, D. (1999), “Competing today while preparing for tomorrow”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 73‐81.
2. Bardy, R. (2010), “Comparative supply chain performance: measuring cross‐cultural effects. The example of the Bratislava regional automotive manufacturing”, Knowledge & Process Management, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 95‐110.
3. Che, Z.H. and Wang, H.S. (2008), “Supplier selection and supply quantity allocation of common and non‐common parts with multiple criteria under multiple products”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 55 No. 1, pp. 110‐33.
4. Chen, K.S. and Chen, K.L. (2006), “Supplier selection by testing the process incapability index”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 589‐600.
5. Chopra, S. and Sodhi, M.S. (2004), “Managing risk to avoid supply‐chain breakdown”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 53‐61.
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献