Author:
Tran Mai An,Nguyen Bang,Melewar T.C.,Bodoh Jim
Abstract
Purpose
– This paper aims to demonstrate the need to explore the image formation process to develop a more holistic definition of corporate image. Diminishing trust in managers has created increasingly negative perceptions toward corporations. Stakeholders are constantly evaluating and scrutinizing corporations to determine their trustworthiness and authenticity. To develop their perceptions toward these corporations, stakeholders rely on the key role of corporate image. In the present study, the complex relationships between corporate image, corporate reputation, corporate communication and corporate personality are investigated. These concepts form a corporation’s image formation process.
Design/methodology/approach
– Radley Yelday (RY), the communications agency collaborating in this research, facilitated 15 interviews with their employees. Using a semi-structured interviewing method, discussions were guided toward the topic of corporate image among the respondents.
Findings
– Findings reveal the importance of corporate image under seven different dimensions: visual expression, positive feelings, environments expression, online appearance, staff/employees appearance, attitude and behavior and external communications (offline, online and effectiveness). Theoretical and managerial implications are discussed with suggestions for future researches.
Originality/value
– The authors develop a conceptual model that illustrates the corporate image formation process. The model includes seven dimensions – both with tangible and intangible aspects – forming corporate communication and corporate personality. These, in turn, translate into the corporate image. With time and experiences, corporate image creates a more consistent reputation, which consists of five different levels: awareness, familiarity, favorability, trust and advocacy. As demonstrated in this research, the seven key dimensions influencing this process are: visual expression, positive feelings, environment, online appearance, staff/employees appearance, attitude and behavior and external communications.
Reference107 articles.
1. Aaker, J.L.
(1997), “Dimensions of brand personality”,
Journal of Marketing Research
, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 347-356.
2. Aiken, L.S.
and
West, S.G.
(1991),
Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
3. Alves, H.
and
Raposo, M.
(2010), “The influence of university image on student behavior”,
International Journal of Educational Management
, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 73-85.
4. Andreassen, T.W.
and
Lindestad, B.
(1998), “Customer loyalty and complex services: the impact of corporate image on quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty for customers with varying degrees of service expertise”,
International Journal of Service Industry Management
, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 7-23.
5. Argenti, P.A.
(2006), “How technology has influenced the field of corporate communication”,
Journal of Business and Technical Communication
, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 357-370.
Cited by
86 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献