Green Care: social entrepreneurs in the agricultural sector
Author:
Heike Johansen Pia
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to provide a sector-based analysis of the drivers for social entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector.
Design/methodology/approach
– The paper uses qualitative data from two studies in the Danish region of Northern Jutland. The data include responses from 38 farmers who offered or had considered offering social services. The analytical framework is taken from a review of the limited literature on Green Care and Social Farming and social entrepreneurship theory.
Findings
– Strong and consistent tools for the categorisation of farmers’ social entrepreneurship have been developed. However, these tools have merely been used descriptively rather than to create proactive agriculture policies to facilitate social entrepreneurship. In Region Northern Jutland social entrepreneurship in farming is driven by a combination of tradition, close relationships and coincidence. It is ad hoc, with each initiative starting from scratch because no knowledge or experience has been gathered or distributed.
Research limitations/implications
– The agricultural sector-based approach to social entrepreneurship will not be discussed against other approaches to social entrepreneurship. This would be a suggestion for another more conceptual kind of article in the future.
Originality/value
– A study of social entrepreneurship among farmers has not yet been coupled with a sector-based analytical framework. This paper contributes to the literature of social entrepreneurship by supplementing with an agricultural sector-based approach.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Sociology and Political Science,Development,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference45 articles.
1. Abramsson, K.
and
Tenngart, C.
(2006), “Nature and health in sweden. in: volume 13 farming for health: Green-care farming across Europe and the United States of America”, in Jan Hassink, Majken van Dijk, M. (Eds.), Springer, pp. 127-134. 2. Armstrong, D.
(2000), “A survey of community gardens in upstate New York. Implications for health promotion and community development”, Health and Place, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 319-327. 3. Austin, J.
,
Stevenson, H.
and
Wei-Skillern, J.
(2006), “Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both?”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 1-22. 4. Bernstein, P.L.
,
Friedmann, E.
and
Malaspina, A.
(2000), “Animal assisted therapy enhances resident social interaction and initiation in long term care facilities”, Anthrozoos, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 213-224. 5. Bock, B.B.
and
Oosting, S.J.
(2010), “A classification of Green Care arrangements in Europe”, in
Dessein,
,
J.
,
Bock,
and
B.
(Eds), The Economics of Green Care in Agriculture, COST 866 Green Care in Agriculture, Loughborough University, Loughborough.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|