Effective resource management in digital forensics

Author:

Wilson-Kovacs DanaORCID

Abstract

Purpose Building on the findings of a British Academy-funded project on the development of digital forensics (DF) in England and Wales, the purpose of this paper is to explore how triage, a process that helps prioritise digital devices for in-depth forensic analysis, is experienced by DF examiners and police officers in four English police forces. It is argued that while as a strategy triage can address the increasing demand in the examination of digital exhibits, careful consideration needs to be paid to the ways in which its set-up, undertaking and outcomes impact on the ability of law enforcement agencies to solve cases. Design/methodology/approach The methodological approach adopted here builds on the ethnographic turn in criminology. The analysis draws on 120 h of ethnographic observations and 43 semi-structured interviews. Observational data of the working DF environment at each location and a systematic evaluation of internal documents, organisational settings and police priorities helped refine emergent analysis threads, which were analytically compared between sites and against the testimonies of members of different occupational groups to identify similarities and differences between accounts. Findings The findings emphasise the challenges in the triage of digital exhibits as they are encountered in everyday practice. The discussion focusses on the tensions between the delivery of timely and accurate investigation results and current gaps in the infrastructural arrangements. It also emphasises the need to provide police officers with a baseline understanding of the role of DF and the importance of clearly defined strategies in the examination of digital devices. Originality/value This paper aims to bridge policy and practice through an analysis of the ways in which DF practitioners and police officers in four English constabularies reflect on the uses of triage in DF to address backlogs and investigative demands. Highlighting the importance of digital awareness beyond the technical remit of DF units, it offers new insights into the ways in which police forces seek to improve the evidential trail with limited resources.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference54 articles.

1. ACPO (2012), “Good Practice Guide for Digital Evidence: Version 5”, available at: www.acpo.police.uk/asp/policies/Data/gpg_computer_based_evidence_v5.pdf (accessed 31 May 2018).

2. The challenges facing computer forensics investigators in obtaining information from mobile devices for use in criminal investigations;Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective,2012

3. A novel approach to maximising the detection of volume crime with DNA and fingerprints;International Journal of Police Science & Management,2008

4. Using thematic analysis in psychology;Qualitative Research in Psychology,2006

5. Investigating and prosecuting cybercrime: forensic dependencies and barriers to justice;International Journal of Cyber Criminology,2015

Cited by 24 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Risky calls: understanding the challenges and risks of using mobile phone data during homicide investigations;Policing and Society;2024-06-25

2. In their own words: Police officers’ insights on identifying and overcoming contemporary policing challenges;International Review of Administrative Sciences;2024-06-04

3. Digital Face Forgery and the Role of Digital Forensics;International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique;2023-08-06

4. Digital evidence strategies for digital forensic science examinations;Science & Justice;2023-01

5. Evincing Offence: How Digital Forensics Turns Big Data into Evidence for Policing Sexual Abuse;Engaging Science, Technology, and Society;2022-12-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3