Effective crowd policing: empirical insights on avoiding protest violence

Author:

Nassauer Anne

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to connect sociology, criminology, and social psychology to identify specific factors that keep protests peaceful, discusses empirical examples of effective peacekeeping, and develops practical peacekeeping guidelines. Design/methodology/approach – The analysis systematically compared 30 peaceful and violent protests in the USA and Germany to identify peaceful interaction routines and how they are disrupted. It employed a triangulation of visual and document data on each demonstration, analyzing over 1,000 documents in total. The paper relies on qualitative analysis based on the principles of process tracing. Findings – Results show that specific interaction sequences and emotional dynamics can break peaceful interaction routines and trigger violence. Single interactions do not break these routines, but certain combinations do. Police forces and protesters need to avoid these interaction dynamics to keep protests peaceful. Communication between both sides and good police management are especially important. Research limitations/implications – The paper highlights the need to examine the role of situational interactions and emotional dynamics for the emergence and avoidance of protest violence more closely. Practical implications – Findings have implications for police practice and training and for officers’ and protesters’ safety. Originality/value – Employing recent data and an interdisciplinary approach, the study systematically analyzes peacekeeping in protests, developing guidelines for protest organizers and police.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference79 articles.

1. ACPO, ACPOS and NPIA (2010), Manual of Guidance on Keeping the Peace , ACPO, ACPOS and NPIA, London, available at: www.acpo.police.uk/documents/uniformed/2010/201010UNKTP01.pdf (accessed November 10, 2013).

2. Adami, E. (2009), “‘We/YouTube’: exploring sign-making in video-interaction”, Visual Communication , Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 379-399.

3. Alpert, G.P. , Dunham, R.G. and MacDonald, J.M. (2004), “Interactive police-citizen encounters that result in force”, Police Quarterly , Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 475-488.

4. BBC (2010), “Student protest policing debate Newsnight (10/12/2010) Claire Solomon”, available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggz0fydXSHI&feature=youtube_gdata_player (accessed March 5, 2012).

5. Bijitaq (2007), “WTO protests: Seattle (2/3)”, available at: www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHfKDgf7lp8&feature=youtube_gdata_player (accessed October 10, 2011).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3