Abstract
PurposePrevious research has shown that terror attacks affect a variety of outcomes. However, one outcome that has remained relatively neglected is crime. In the current study we examine the immediate effect of terrorism on crime, and discuss several behavioral mechanisms that might explain this effect.Design/methodology/approachWe use data from 190 Israeli localities over 12 years (1999–2011). Applying a fixed-effects Poisson regression model, we assess the effect of terror attacks on recorded crimes of three types – property, domestic violence, and fraud – on the days following the attack. We also examine whether the effect is conditioned on geographical proximity to the attack.FindingsWe find the occurrence of terror attacks has a significant and negative effect on recorded cases of the three crime types. This effect grows stronger as geographical proximity to the attack increases.Originality/valueOur results suggest that terrorism has an immediate negative effect on crime. This effect might be explained by changes in the behavior of police officers, offenders, and citizens.
Reference49 articles.
1. Intra-week spatial-temporal patterns of crime;Crime Science,2015
2. Antoniou, C., Kumar, A. and Maligkris, A. (2017), “Terrorist attacks, managerial sentiment, and corporate policies”, in Managerial Sentiment, and Corporate Policies.
3. The local cost of terror: effects of the second Palestinian Intifada on Jerusalem house prices;Regional Science and Urban Economics,2010
4. Criminal pasts, terrorist futures: European jihadists and the new crime-terror nexus;Perspectives on Terrorism,2016