Abstract
PurposePolice legitimacy presents a social value of the institution based on citizens' normative, moral and ethical feelings that they should voluntarily comply with and support the authority of the police. The present study focuses on residents' perceptions of police legitimacy in different settings in Slovenia.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on data from a survey of 1,022 citizens in Slovenia, this study examined the correlates of police legitimacy and differences in citizen perceptions of police legitimacy in urban, suburban and rural settings.FindingsMultivariate statistical analyses showed that feelings of obligation to obey, trust in police, procedural justice, police effectiveness, relations with police officers and gender influence perceptions of police legitimacy. Significant differences between residents' perceptions of police legitimacy, obligation to obey, trust in police, procedural justice, police effectiveness and legal cynicism in urban, suburban and rural settings were also observed. In general, residents of rural areas were found to have more positive attitudes towards the police than those in urban and suburban settings.Practical implicationsThe article is useful for police leaders and practitioners planning policies and training of police officers for democratic policing.Social implicationsPolice legitimacy reflects the legitimacy of governance, as the police are the most visible representatives of the state authority. Therefore, police legitimacy is crucial for policing in urban, suburban and rural settings.Originality/valueThe study presents the first test of police legitimacy in a non-Western cultural environment based on a national sample of citizens, which enables the generalisation of concepts of legitimacy, and its correlates in a different cultural setting. The study also presents the first attempt to test and compare the effect of the settings (i.e. rural, suburban and urban) on variables influencing residents' perceptions of police legitimacy.
Reference50 articles.
1. Abdi, H. (2003), “Factor rotations in factor analyses”, in Lewis-Beck, M., Bryman, A. and Futing, T. (Eds), Encyclopedia of Social Sciences Research Methods (Vol. 1) (1st Ed,), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 792-795.
2. Beyond procedural justice: a dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice;Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology,2012
3. Bottoms, A. and Tankebe, J. (2021), “Procedural justice, legitimacy and social contexts”, in Meyerson, D., Mackenzie, C. and MacDermot, T. (Eds), Procedural Justice and Relational Theory: Empirical, Philosophical, and Legal Perspectives, Routledge, London, pp. 85-110.
4. Bradford, B., Jackson, J. and Hough, M. (2013), “Police futures and legitimacy: redefining 'good policing'”, available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2171394 (accessed 5 July 2023).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Increase of fear of crime in rural Brazil and police legitimacy;Journal of Rural Studies;2024-08
2. Evaluating Policing Models in Rural Croatia: Residents’ Perceptions and Preferences in Požeško-Slavonska County;The UN Sustainable Development Goals and Provision of Security, Responses to Crime and Security Threats, and Fair Criminal Justice Systems;2024-07-08
3. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, Criminology and Criminal Justice;The UN Sustainable Development Goals and Provision of Security, Responses to Crime and Security Threats, and Fair Criminal Justice Systems;2024-07-08
4. Raziskovanje na področju varnosti v lokalnih skupnostih;Varnost v lokalnih skupnostih – multidisciplinarne perspektive;2024-06-20
5. Ruralna kriminologija in varnost v lokalnih skupnostih – slovenske perspektive;Varnost v lokalnih skupnostih – multidisciplinarne perspektive;2024-06-20