The stronger, the better? A natural experiment on the effects of pepper spray concentration levels

Author:

Boivin RémiORCID,Tanguay Caroline

Abstract

PurposeOleoresin capsicum (OC) spray has proven to be a relatively effective tool to subdue resistant or aggressive subjects without causing major and permanent injuries. Several products are available to law enforcement organizations and sprays with higher concentrations are sold as more effective, despite the lack of empirical evidence. This article aims to test the proposition that more concentrated OC sprays are more effective in a policing context.Design/methodology/approachTo test this proposition, retrospective data on police interventions that had occurred (N = 1,019) were used. Concentrations were divided in three levels: level 1 sprays (containing up to 0.49% of major capsaicinoids), level 2 sprays (from 0.5% to 0.99%) and level 3 sprays (between 1 and 1.33%). Propensity scores were calculated to estimate the average effect of concentration level on effectiveness, while controlling for confounding factors.FindingsLevel 1 and level 2 sprays were found to be similar in terms of effectiveness, but level 3 sprays were found to be more likely to have an immediate effect but were also related to higher chances that decontamination was needed after use.Originality/valueWhile several studies of the effectiveness of OC spray in general have been conducted in the past, this is one of the few to differentiate types of OC sprays according to their concentration level. As such, it aims to provide guidance to police organizations who must choose among a variety of products.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. Pepper spray: an unreasonable response to suspect verbal resistance;Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management,2004

2. Assessing the performance of pepper spray in use‐of‐force encounters: the Dutch experience;Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management,2006

3. Apel, R.J. and Sweeten, G. (2010), “Propensity score matching in criminology and criminal Justice”, in Piquero, A. and Weisburd, D. (Eds), Handbook of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, New York, pp. 543-562.

4. Use of pepper spray in policing: retrospective study of situational characteristics and implications for violent situations;Police Practice and Research,2017

5. Correlates of subject(ive) resistance in police use of force situations;Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3