Procedural justice concerns and support for BWCs: turning the lens to officer perceptions

Author:

Saulnier Alana,St Louis Ermus,McCarty William

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore factors that drive officer support for body-worn cameras (BWCs). Design/methodology/approach Results of an officer perceptions survey completed as part of an evaluation of the Chicago Police Department’s BWC project are presented. The influence of treatment- and outcome-oriented justice concerns on officer support for BWCs is explored with a variety of covariates. Findings Outcome-oriented concerns are a significant predictor of officer support for BWCs, while treatment-oriented concerns are not. Practical implications The research enhances understandings of the applicability of procedural justice theorizing in policing generally, and offers direction important to the meaningful use of BWCs. Originality/value This finding runs counter to dominant relational models of procedural justice that concentrate on the perspective of subordinates, but lends support to arguments advocating the centrality of role (authority vs subordinate) in the formation of justice evaluations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference76 articles.

1. The effect of police body-worn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: a randomized controlled trial;Journal of Quantitative Criminology,2015

2. Fair and effective policing methods: towards ‘good enough’ policing;Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention,2007

3. Policing and social identity: procedural justice, inclusion and cooperation between police and public;Policing & Society,2014

4. Bradford, B., Jackson, J. and Hough, M. (2013), “Police futures and legitimacy: redefining ‘good policing’”, in Brown, J. (Ed.), The Future of Policing, Routledge, Oxon, pp. 79-99.

5. Why do ‘the law’ comply? Procedural justice, group identification and officer motivation in police organizations;European Journal of Criminology,2014

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3