Police use of force and race: a focal concerns theoretical perspective

Author:

Kim Dae-YoungORCID,Phillips Scott W.ORCID

Abstract

PurposeThe present study examines the risk of citizens encountering police use of intermediate and deadly force, as opposed to using physical force, given a set of individual, situational and neighborhood variables.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses data from 2003 to 2016 in the Dallas Open Data Portal. Two-level multinomial logistic regression is used to analyze the data.FindingsThe effects of citizen race differ across the types of police force. Overall, citizen race plays no significant role in the officer's decision to shoot firearms at citizens. However, there is evidence of intra-racial disparity in officer-involved shootings (OISs) between Hispanic citizens and officers. African American citizens are disproportionately exposed to display-but-don't shoot incidents, while Hispanic citizens have a lower risk of encountering police use of intermediate weapons.Originality/valueThe study helps to understand how citizen and officer race influence and interact across various types of police force. Implications of the results are offered in relation to relevant literature.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Law,Public Administration,Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference56 articles.

1. Adams, K. (1999), “What we know about police use of force”, in Use of Force by Police: Overview of National and Local Data, National Institute of Justice and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC, pp. 1-14.

2. Bittner, E. (1990), “The functions of the police in modern society”, in Bittner, E. (Ed.), Aspects of Police Work, Northeastern University Press, Boston, pp. 120-132.

3. Police use of force: assessing the impact of time and space;Policing and Society,2008

4. Focal concerns and police use of force: examining the factors associated with Taser use;Police Quarterly,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3