Tough but not terrific: value destruction in men’s health

Author:

McGraw JacquieORCID,Russell-Bennett RebekahORCID,White Katherine M.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of masculine identity in generating value destruction and diminished well-being in a preventative health service. Design/methodology/approach This research used five focus groups with 39 Australian men aged between 50 and 74 years. Men’s participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program informed the sample frame. In total, 12 Jungian male archetypes were used to identify different masculine identities. Findings Thematic analysis of the data revealed three themes of masculinity that explain why men destroy value by avoiding the use of a preventative health services including: rejection of the service reduces consumer disempowerment and emasculation, active rejection of resources creates positive agency and suppressing negative self-conscious emotions protects the self. Research limitations/implications Limitations include the single context of bowel cancer screening. Future research could investigate value destruction in other preventative health contexts such as testicular cancer screening, sexual health screening and drug abuse. Practical implications Practical implications include fostering consumer empowerment when accessing services, developing consumer resources to create positive agency and boosting positive self-conscious emotions by promoting positive social norms. Originality/value This research is the first known study to explore how value is destroyed in men’s preventative health using the perspective of gender identity. This research also is the first to explore value destruction as an emotion regulation strategy.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Strategy and Management

Reference111 articles.

1. Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking;American Psychologist,2003

2. Developing qualitative research questions: a reflective process;International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education,2009

3. AMSRS (2019a), “Participating in focus groups”, Australian Market and Social Research Society, Glebe, available at: www.amsrs.com.au/about/information-for-the-general-public/participating-in-focus-groups (accessed 5 June 2019).

4. AMSRS (2019b), “Code of professional behaviour”, Australian Market and Social Research Society, Glebe, available at: www.amsrs.com.au/professional-standards/code-of-professional-behaviour/code-of-professional-behaviour (accessed 5 June 2019).

5. Transformative service research: an agenda for the future;Journal of Business Research,2013

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3