New data strategies: nonprobability sampling, mobile, big data

Author:

Link Michael

Abstract

Purpose Researchers now have more ways than ever before to capture information about groups of interest. In many areas, these are augmenting traditional survey approaches – in others, new methods are potential replacements. This paper aims to explore three key trends: use of nonprobability samples, mobile data collection and administrative and “big data.” Design/methodology/approach Insights and lessons learned about these emerging trends are drawn from recent published articles and relevant scientific conference papers. Findings Each new trend has its own timeline in terms of methodological maturity. While mobile technologies for data capture are being rapidly adopted, particularly the use of internet-based surveys conducted on mobile devices, nonprobability sampling methods remain rare in most government research. Resource and quality pressures combined with the intensive research focus on new sampling methods, are, however, making nonprobability sampling a more attractive option. Finally, exploration of “big data” is becoming more common, although there are still many challenges to overcome – methodological, quality and access – before such data are used routinely. Originality/value This paper provides a timely review of recent developments in the field of data collection strategies, drawing on numerous current studies and practical applications in the field.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Education

Reference33 articles.

1. Baker, R., Brick, J.M., Bates, N.A., Battaglia, M., Couper, M.P., Dever, J.A. and Tourangeau, R. (2013), “Report of the AAPOR task force on non-probability sampling”, American Association for Public Opinion Research, available at: www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/MainSiteFiles/NPS_TF_Report_Final_7_revised_FNL6_22_13.pdf

2. Comparing the reliability of Amazon Mechanical Turk and Survey Monkey to traditional market research surveys,2017

3. Selection bias in web surveys;International Statistical Review,2010

4. Brick, J.M., Mathiowetz, N.A., Cho, S., Cohen, J., Igielnik, R., Keeter, S. and McGeeney, K. (2015), “Weighting and sample matching effects for an online sample”, paper presented at the 70th Annual American Association for Public Opinion Research Conference, Hollywood, FL, 14-17 May.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3