Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to evaluate the use of a framework and planner for researcher development introduced into the United Kingdom in 2010 by Vitae: an organisation whose purpose is to support the development of UK researchers.Design/methodology/approachQualitative and quantitative data from two cohorts participating in an accredited researcher development course designed and delivered by the Centre for Academic Practice and Learning Enhancement at the University of Strathclyde were analysed.FindingsParticipants reported that the Vitae Researcher Development Framework (RDF) personal development planner (PDP) was useful in facilitating career development. Most found it relatively easy to use once initial perceptions of the tool as being overly detailed and complex were overcome. In addition, some technical problems with the software were identified. There was great variation in the manner in which the RDF was used (for instance in the number of descriptors selected). Although use was highly individualised, the full range of descriptors was used between the course participants.Practical implicationsThe results suggest that the RDF PD planner has great potential in supporting researcher development, provided certain specified conditions are met – in particular the need to ensure individualisation, support, and researcher ownership of the outcomes. Further evaluation is necessary.Originality/valueThis is the first report on the RDF PDP being used in a researcher development course.
Reference22 articles.
1. Åkerlind, G. (2005), “Postdoctoral researchers: roles, functions and career prospects”, Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 21‐40.
2. Alpay, E. and Walsh, E.A. (2008), “A skills perception inventory for evaluating postgraduate transferable skills development”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 581‐98.
3. Bromley, A.P., Boran, J.R. and Myddelton, W.A. (2007), “Investigating the baseline skills of research students using a competency‐based self‐assessment method”, Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 117‐37.
4. Bromley, T., Metcalfe, J. and Park, C. (2008), The Rugby Team Impact Framework (RTIF), available at: www.vitae.ac.uk/CMS/files/1.Rugby%20Impact%20Framework_33.pdf (accessed 6 October 2011).
5. Diemer, M.A. and Gore, P.A. Jr (2009), “Culture and assessment: nomothetic and idiographic considerations”, The Career Development Quarterly, Vol. 57 No. 4, pp. 342‐7.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献