Author:
Gard Marshall Joanne,Craft Morgan Jennifer,A. Thompson Cheryl,L. Wells Amber
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore library and information service impact on patient care quality.
Design/methodology/approach
– A large-scale critical incident survey of physicians and residents at 56 library sites serving 118 hospitals in the USA and Canada. Respondents were asked to base their answers on a recent incident in which they had used library resources to search for information related to a specific clinical case.
Findings
– Of 4,520 respondents, 75 percent said that they definitely or probably handled patient care differently using information obtained through the library. In a multivariate analysis, three summary clinical outcome measures were used as value and impact indicators: first, time saved; second, patient care changes; and third, adverse events avoided. The outcomes were examined in relation to four information access methods: first, asking librarian for assistance; second, performing search in a physical library; third, searching library's web site; or fourth, searching library resources on an institutional intranet. All library access methods had consistently positive relationships with the clinical outcomes, providing evidence that library services have a positive impact on patient care quality.
Originality/value
– Electronic collections and services provided by the library and the librarian contribute to patient care quality.
Subject
Health Policy,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference18 articles.
1. Aitken, E.M.
,
Powelson, S.E.
,
Reaume, D.
and
Ghali, W.A.
(2011), “Involving clinical librarians at the point of care: results of a controlled intervention”, Academic Medicine, Vol. 86 No. 12, pp. 1508-1512.
2. Butterfield, L.D.
,
Borgen, W.A.
,
Amundson, N.E.
and
Maglio, A.
(2005), “Fifty years of the critical incident technique 1954-2004 and beyond”, Qualitative Research, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 475-497.
3. Cook, C.
,
Heath, F.
and
Thompson, R.L.
(2012), “A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 60 No. 6, pp. 821-836.
4. Dunn, K.
,
Brewer, K.
,
Marshall, J.G.
and
Sollenberger, J.
(2009), “Measuring the value and impact of health sciences libraries: planning an update and replication of the Rochester study”, Journal of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 97 No. 4, pp. 308-312.
5. Institute of Medicine
(2012), Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献