Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to utilize the Objective Knowledge Growth Framework (OKGF) to promote a better understanding of the evaluating tenure and promotion processes.
Design/methodology/approach
– A scenario is created to illustrate the concept of using OKGF.
Findings
– The framework aims to support decision makers in identifying the challenges they face, encourages them to act on their tentative theories, and to be attentive to the outcomes. It requires a deeper understanding of the problem by shifting the spotlight to the teaching scores; multiple perspectives for reaching a solution; testing different options (solutions/theories) by seeking out information that challenges ones beliefs and biases so as not to overlook a viable solution; and ensuring a fair and just process.
Research limitations/implications
– Research can be expanded by developing an empirical research study and to validate the findings.
Practical implications
– It is a high stakes evaluation that may result in unjustified dismissal.
Originality/value
– The paper is original in that the tenure process has not come under scrutiny under a conceptual framework such as the OKGF.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education
Reference27 articles.
1. Chitpin, S.
(2010), “A critical approach for building teacher knowledge”,
The International Journal of Education
, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 1-14.
2. Chitpin, S.
(2013), “Can mentoring and reflection cause change in teaching practice? A professional development journey of a Canadian teacher educator”
Professional Development in Education
, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 225-240.
3. Chitpin, S.
and
Evers, C.W.
(2012), “Using popper’s philosophy of science to build pre-service teachers’ knowledge”,
International Journal of Education
, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 144-156, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/ije.v4i4.2757
4. Chitpin, S. and Jones, K.
(2015), “Leadership in a performative context: a framework for decision-making”,
Educational Philosophy and Theory
(in press).
5. Chitpin, S.
and
Simon, M.
(2012), “Capturing problem-solving processes using critical rationalism”,
Teacher Education & Practice
, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 302-319.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献