Author:
Bu Maoliang,Rotchadl Steven,Bu Mengmeng
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to conduct a comparative study between the historical development of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in both the USA and China. It is motivated by the phenomenon that CSR is developing in two different directions (global vs local).
Design/methodology/approach
A comparative study on sustainability-linked compensation illustrates how CSR in the USA is driven by firm-level economic decisions, in which the manifestations of CSR are usually those which prove to be the most profitable financially. Moreover, a case analysis on the green bond market in China contrarily illustrates how CSR in China is usually based more on alignment with top-down, state-led initiatives in which the state directs the ways in which CSR is manifested.
Findings
This paper reveals that despite globalizing trends are attempting to unify definitions of CSR, they inevitably become localized to fit the societal needs in which they are located.
Originality/value
By understanding how CSR development in these two countries has changed over time, this paper shows that future developments in CSR will likely be influenced more by local practices than by converging global forces.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference120 articles.
1. The dubious role of institutions in international business: a road forward;Journal of International Business Studies,2019
2. What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility a review and research agenda;Journal of Management,2012
3. Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations;Journal of Business Ethics,2000
4. Executive bonuses and corporate responsibility,2010
5. Institutional reforms and investor reactions to CSR announcements: evidence from an emerging economy;Journal of Management Studies,2009
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献