Author:
Malekzadeh Roya,Yaghoubian Samereh,Hasanpoor Edris,Ghasemi Matina
Abstract
Purpose
Responsiveness is a reaction to the reasonable expectations of patients regarding ethical and non-clinical aspects of the health-care system. Responsiveness is a characteristic of health-care system and the observance of the patient’s rights. The purpose of this study is to compare the responsiveness of the health-care system based on the hospital ownership in Mazandaran province in Iran.
Design/methodology/approach
The cross-sectional study design was used on 1,083 patients referred to public and private hospitals and hospitals affiliated to social security organization in Mazandaran province in 2017. The World Health Organization’s responsibility questionnaire was used to collect data. Data were analyzed by using SPSS version 21. Descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA results are presented is the results section.
Findings
All responsiveness dimensions were salient for respondents. The response rate in the selected hospitals was very close, which ranged from 85.7 to 90.2%, and there was no significant difference between public, private and social security hospitals (p > 0.05). The most crucial responsiveness dimension in hospitals was autonomy.
Originality/value
In the current study, the dimensions of communication and confidentiality were identified as priority dimensions based on the least score for breeding actions to improve the responsiveness of the health-care system. At the end, some useful recommendations such as re-engineering the processes, training to engage the employees with patients and encouraging them to fill the gap were suggested.
Subject
Health Policy,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology,Health (social science)
Reference29 articles.
1. Assessment of resident physician program: a case study of Mazandaran;Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences,2018
2. Impact of patients’ safety rights and medical errors on the patients’ security feeling: a cross-sectional study;International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare,2019
3. Measuring health system performance: a new approach to accountability and quality improvement in New Zealand;Health Policy,2015
4. What is the role of individual accountability in patient safety? A multi‐site ethnographic study;Sociology of Health & Illness,2016
5. Thinking about accountability;Healthcare Policy = Politiques de Sante,2014
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献