Editorial for the Journal of Organizational Ethnography

Author:

Brannan Matthew,Rowe Mike,Worthington Frank

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide an introduction to the new journal, its history, scope and ambitions.Design/methodology/approachThe paper reviews the current growth in interest in ethnographic research in organizational and management studies, reflected not least in the success of the Liverpool‐Keele Ethnography Symposium.FindingsSurveying the state of the field, this paper has identified a need for a natural home for organizational ethnographers. The continuing growth and development of the Symposium is also a reflection of the shared experience among would‐be ethnographers who find that, when presenting ethnographic work at other conferences, their choice of methodology is more often subject to contrarian rather than constructive discussion. It is only by debating the merits of the empirical and theoretical themes and perspectives that inform the subject in a constructive way with others, who are genuinely appreciative of the tradition, that it will develop.Originality/valueThe paper presents the case for a platform for the publishing of quality organizational ethnographies and for a forum in which to debate and develop the methodology and methods associated with them. It argues for a “collective manifesto” embracing and encouraging the diversity of approaches and introduces the first contributions.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Medicine

Reference17 articles.

1. Clegg, S. (1989), Frameworks of Power, Sage, London.

2. Deegan, M.J. (2007), “The Chicago school of ethnography”, in Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., Delmont, S., Loftland, J. and Loftland, L. (Eds), The Handbook of Ethnography, Sage Publications, London.

3. Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1994), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

4. Geertz, S. (1986), The Interpretation of Cultures, Basic Books, Perseus Book Group, New York, NY.

5. Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (2009), Ethnography: Principles in Practice, Routledge, London.

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3