Author:
Varady David,Kleinhans Reinout,van Ham Maarten
Abstract
Purpose
– The aim of this paper is to assess the current potential of community entrepreneurship in neighbourhood revitalisation in the US and the UK. The global economic crisis has had a major impact on government spending for urban regeneration. In the context of these austerity regimes, in many European countries, community entrepreneurship and active citizenship are increasingly considered as a means to continue small-scale urban revitalisation. This paper investigates recent literature on both British community enterprises (CEs) and American community development corporations (CDCs).
Design/methodology/approach
– Starting from a seminal article, this paper reviews literature focusing on the role of CEs and CDCs in neighbourhood revitalisation. Differences and similarities are analysed, taking into account national context differences.
Findings
– While CDCs have a relatively successful record in affordable housing production in distressed areas, CDCs are fundamentally limited in terms of reversing processes of community decline. CEs in the UK have focused on non-housing issues.
Research limitations/implications
– This paper asks the question what CEs can learn from CDCs in terms of scope, aims, strategies, accountability, assets and partnerships with public and private actors. However, a systematic literature review has not been conducted.
Originality/value
– This comparison reveals not only similarities but also differences with regard to aims, organisational characteristics, cooperation on multiple scales and community participation. Apart from lessons that can be learned, this paper provides recommendations for further research that should cover the lack of empirical evidence in this field.
Subject
Strategy and Management,Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management
Reference84 articles.
1. Accordino, J.
and
Fasulo, F.
(2013), “Fusing technical and political rationality in community development: a prescriptive model of efficiency-based strategic geographic targeting”,
Housing Policy Debate
, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 615-642.
2. Bacq, S.
and
Janssen, F.
(2011), “The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: a review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria”,
Entrepreneurship & Regional Development
, Vol. 23 Nos 5/6, pp. 373-403.
3. Bailey, N.
(2012), “The role, organization and contribution of community enterprise to urban regeneration policy in the UK”,
Progress in Planning
, Vol. 77, pp. 1-35.
4. Beauregard, R.A.
(2013), “Strategic thinking for distressed neighborhoods”, in
Dewar, M.
and
Thomas, J.M.
(Eds),
The City After Abandonment
, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 227-243.
5. Berke, P.R.
and
Godschalk, D.
(2009), “Searching for the good plan: a meta-analysis of plan studies”,
Journal of Planning Literature
, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 227-240.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献