The impact of business process orientation on financial and non‐financial performance
Author:
Škrinjar Rok,Bosilj‐Vukšić Vesna,Indihar‐Štemberger Mojca
Abstract
PurposeExtensive literature on business process management suggests that organizations could enhance their overall performance by adopting a process view of business. However, there is a lack of empirical research in this field. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the understanding of the process view and process maturity levels in a transition economy and to test the impact of process orientation maturity level on organizational performance.Design/methodology/approachEmpirical investigation combined an exploratory‐confirmatory approach using factor analysis and structural equation modeling.FindingsThe investigation confirms the impact of business process orientation on organizational performance in a transition economy. The link is even stronger than in the original investigation. The results show that business process orientation leads to better non‐financial performance and indirectly to better financial performance.Practical implicationsThe research confirms that business process orientation is advantageous for companies since it has a positive influence on organizational performance. The finding that the impact on financial performance is indirect through non‐financial performance suggests that the companies have to take that view of performance into consideration as well.Originality/valueThe paper is valuable for academics and practitioners because the impact of business process orientation on organizational performance has been confirmed for a transitional economy. Its originality is in the measurement of organizational performance, for which a more detailed specification of organizational performance based on the balanced scorecard concept that includes non‐financial performance measures has been used.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference58 articles.
1. Agrell, P.J., Bogetoft, P. and Tind, J. (2002), “Incentive plans for productive efficiency, innovation and learnining”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 78, pp. 1‐11. 2. Atkinson, A.A., Waterhouse, J.H. and Wells, R.B. (1997), “A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 38, pp. 25‐37. 3. Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y. (1988), “On the evaluation of structural equation models”, Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 74‐94. 4. Berman, S.L., Wicks, A.C., Kotha, S. and Jones, T.M. (1999), “Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and a firm financial performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42 No. 5, pp. 488‐506. 5. Bollen, K.A. and Long, J.S. (1993), Testing Structural Equation Models, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Cited by
151 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|