Abstract
PurposeThis paper summarizes typical pitfalls as they can be observed in larger process modeling projects.Design/methodology/approachThe identified pitfalls have been derived from a series of focus groups and semi‐structured interviews with business process analysts and managers of process management and modeling projects.FindingsThe paper provides a list of typical characteristics of unsuccessful process modeling. It covers six pitfalls related to strategy and governance (1‐3) and the involved stakeholders (4‐6). Further issues related to tools and related requirements (7‐10), the practice of modeling (11‐16), the way we design to‐be models (17‐19), and how we deal with success of modeling and maintenance issues (19‐21) will be discussed in the second part of this paper.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper is a personal viewpoint, and does not report on the outcomes of a structured qualitative research project.Practical implicationsThe provided list of total 22 pitfalls increases the awareness for the main challenges related to process modeling and helps to identify common mistakes.Originality/valueThis paper is one of the very few contributions in the area of challenges related to process modeling.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference1 articles.
1. Denrell, J. (2005), “Selection bias and the perils of benchmarking”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 83 No. 1.
Cited by
144 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献