A framework for the improvement of knowledge‐intensive business processes

Author:

Dalmaris Peter,Tsui Eric,Hall Bill,Smith Bob

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to present research into the improvement of knowledge‐intensive business processes.Design/methodology/approachA literature review is conducted that indicates that a gap exists in the area of knowledge‐based business process improvement (KBPI). Sir Karl Popper's theory of objective knowledge is used as a conceptual basis for the design of a business process improvement (BPI) framework. Case studies are conducted to evaluate and further evolve the improvement framework in two different organisations.FindingsHighlights the gap in the literature. Draws attention to the merits of KBPI. Reports on the design of an improvement framework for knowledge‐intensive business processes, and on the lessons learned from the conducted case studies.Research limitations/implicationsPractical and time constraints limit the scope of the case studies. General applicability can be inferred, but not tested, due to the small number of case studies.Practical implicationsA new practical way to achieve performance improvement, that utilises structured tools on intangible organisational assets. The framework can be applied by organisations that run knowledge‐intensive business processes.Originality/valueThis paper addresses a gap in the area of KBPI. It combines concepts from business process management with a robust theory of knowledge to design a practical improvement framework. The paper also contains interesting argumentation supporting the use of Karl Popper's epistemology in BPI and knowledge management.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management

Reference52 articles.

1. Abbott, R. (1991), The Process of Improvement: Your Total Quality Management Tool Bag, IBM.

2. APQC (2004), “APQC process classification framework”, APQC, available at: www.apqc.org/portal/apqc/ksn/PCF_Complete_May_5_2004.pdf?paf_gear_id= contentgearhome&paf_dm = full&pageselect = contentitem&docid = 115313 (accessed 30 December).

3. BPMI.org (2001), “Business process modelling language specification 1.0”, available at: www.bpmi.org/ (accessed 2 June 2005).

4. BPMI.org (2004), “Business process modelling notation (BPMN), business process management initiative”, available at: www.bpmi.org/ (accessed 4 January 2005).

5. Checkland, P. (1981), Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, New York, NY.

Cited by 49 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3