Where good ERP implementations go bad: a case for continuity

Author:

Allen Lee E.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to identify and examine the concerns of administrative and clerical employees towards a web‐based business system and associated training which were not identified either before or during an enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation. Post‐implementation analyses revealed that while an implementation can be deemed a success immediately following go‐live dates, long‐term planning is essential to maintain change management continuity for administrators and employees.Design/methodology/approachThe stages of concern component of the concerns‐based adoption model offered a method of analysis of the Dallas, Texas, Independent School District's employees to identify the perceptions and levels of acceptance of the users in regards to the implementation of an ERP system in a public school district.FindingsThe findings for the research questions assisted in interpreting and categorizing the responses to the open‐ended portion of the stages of concern questionnaire; and providing recommended guidelines for future ERP implementations in similar environments.Practical implicationsThe paper shows how leaders in an organization must understand the employees' perceptions of the changes taking place in an ERP implementation and post‐implementation. Based on the findings, a summary, conclusion, and recommendations for further research are provided to assist K‐12 districts in planning for ERP implementations.Originality/valueThe significance of this study encompasses the impact of the integration of new technology with various associated people, processes, and systems. Understanding the impact of such potentially significant change by measuring a user community's overall perception and level of acceptance is a key component in providing guidance for future implementations in similar organizational and institutional environments.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management

Reference9 articles.

1. Bushweller, K. (2000), “The smarter office: how school districts are automating administrative tasks”, Electronic School, March, pp. 26‐8.

2. Drucker, P.F. (1999), Management Challenges for the 21st Century, HarperCollins, New York, NY.

3. Frantz, P.S., Southerland, A.R. and Johnson, J.T. (2002), “ERP software: implementation best practices”, Educause Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 38‐45.

4. Hall, G.E., George, A.A. and Rutherford, W.L. (1998), Measuring Stages of Concern about the Innovation: A Manual for Use of the SoC Questionnaire, Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, Austin, TX.

5. Hall, G.E., Wallace, R.C. and Dossett, W.A. (1973), A Developmental Conceptualization of the Adoption Process within Educational Institutions, Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas, Austin, TX.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3