Myths and ceremonies among the corporate governance institutions: introducing the concept of corporate governance culture

Author:

Klepczarek Emilia

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to provide the conditions for governance effectiveness and explain why the same rules often result in not the same norms. Design/methodology/approach The author proposes a “corporate governance culture” concept explaining the differences within corporate governance institutions and making it possible to measure their effectiveness. Based on a literature review that included 186 research studies published in the corporate governance field, the author found that most (160) concern structural numerical variables. Only 26 refer to behavioural and cultural issues, and they support the idea of an interdisciplinary approach to governance problems. Findings A significant contribution of this paper is that it proposes an integrative framework that operationalises psychological, sociological and philosophical issues that influence corporate governance mechanisms. The proposed concept can reanimate the debate about the need for tight governance regulations or leaving room for a loose governance regime. Originality/value The idea of “corporate governance culture” explains the divergences identified in studies on corporate governance mechanisms, pointing out behavioural and cultural issues as crucial aspects of governance bodies.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference54 articles.

1. The impact of board size on board demographic faultlines;Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society,2020

2. A rejoinder on managerial discretion: Andersen (2017) vs Haj Youssef and Teng (2019);Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society,2020

3. Corporate directors - who needs them?;The Modern Law Review,1988

4. The theory of institutional change;Journal of Economic Issues,1987

5. Social media fostering happiness management: three luxury brands case study on Instagram;Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3