Author:
Mason Katy,Mouzas Stefanos
Abstract
PurposeThe aim in this paper is to describe and explain the flexibility offered by different business models adopted by different firms as they strive to achieve higher levels of business performance.Design/methodology/approachCross‐sectional research is used to investigate a matched pair sample of 20 high‐performing and 20 low‐performing firms in the UK. The relationship between business model architectures and focus are examined and their implications for flexibility are illustrated and discussed.FindingsThe flexibility offered by different business models is explored through the way organisations select and integrate three inter‐related elements to devise flexible business models, i.e. network influence, transactional relationships, and corporate ownership. Affected by situated practices in each business network and the market position or business size, companies select and integrate various configurations of these elements to respond to the constantly evolving demands of end‐customers.Research limitations/implicationsAlthough based upon a cross‐sectional analysis of a matched pair sample, the concept of “flexible business models” has far wider managerial implications. The efficiency of the proposed approach is achieved through the reduction into three inter‐related elements that allow flexible configuration and re‐adjustment.Practical implicationsCompanies can use the flexible business model approach to examine their own selection and integration of network influence, transactional relationships and corporate ownership and scrutinise their flexibility and performance in the marketplace.Originality/valueThe contribution of this paper is the development of the flexible business models concept, based on an empirical investigation of firms in the UK.
Reference61 articles.
1. Amit, R. and Zott, C. (2001), “Value creation in e‐business”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22 Nos 6/7, p. 493.
2. Araujo, L. and Easton, G. (1996), “Strategy – where is the pattern?”, Organization, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 361‐83.
3. Araujo, L., Dubois, A. and Gadde, L.‐E. (2003), “The multiple boundaries of the firm”, The Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 40 No. 5, p. 1255.
4. Axelsson, B. and Easton, G. (1992), Industrial Networks: A New View of Reality, Routledge, London.
5. Beamon, B.M. and Ware, T.M. (1998), “A process quality model for the analysis, improvement and control of supply chain systems”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 28 Nos 9/10, p. 704.
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献