Flexible business models

Author:

Mason Katy,Mouzas Stefanos

Abstract

PurposeThe aim in this paper is to describe and explain the flexibility offered by different business models adopted by different firms as they strive to achieve higher levels of business performance.Design/methodology/approachCross‐sectional research is used to investigate a matched pair sample of 20 high‐performing and 20 low‐performing firms in the UK. The relationship between business model architectures and focus are examined and their implications for flexibility are illustrated and discussed.FindingsThe flexibility offered by different business models is explored through the way organisations select and integrate three inter‐related elements to devise flexible business models, i.e. network influence, transactional relationships, and corporate ownership. Affected by situated practices in each business network and the market position or business size, companies select and integrate various configurations of these elements to respond to the constantly evolving demands of end‐customers.Research limitations/implicationsAlthough based upon a cross‐sectional analysis of a matched pair sample, the concept of “flexible business models” has far wider managerial implications. The efficiency of the proposed approach is achieved through the reduction into three inter‐related elements that allow flexible configuration and re‐adjustment.Practical implicationsCompanies can use the flexible business model approach to examine their own selection and integration of network influence, transactional relationships and corporate ownership and scrutinise their flexibility and performance in the marketplace.Originality/valueThe contribution of this paper is the development of the flexible business models concept, based on an empirical investigation of firms in the UK.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Marketing

Reference61 articles.

1. Amit, R. and Zott, C. (2001), “Value creation in e‐business”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22 Nos 6/7, p. 493.

2. Araujo, L. and Easton, G. (1996), “Strategy – where is the pattern?”, Organization, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 361‐83.

3. Araujo, L., Dubois, A. and Gadde, L.‐E. (2003), “The multiple boundaries of the firm”, The Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 40 No. 5, p. 1255.

4. Axelsson, B. and Easton, G. (1992), Industrial Networks: A New View of Reality, Routledge, London.

5. Beamon, B.M. and Ware, T.M. (1998), “A process quality model for the analysis, improvement and control of supply chain systems”, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 28 Nos 9/10, p. 704.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3