Author:
Adams Gary A.,Webster Jennica R.,Buyarski Danelle M.
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a measure of occupational embeddedness.Design/methodology/approachThe construct of occupational embeddedness was defined in terms of the forces that bind people to their occupation. Then a four‐part study was conducted to develop a measure of it.FindingsIn Part 1, items were developed and judgmental evidence for their content validity was generated. In Part 2 the initial psychometric characteristics were examined. The results supported the internal consistency reliability and factor structure of the measure. In Part 3, Part 2 was replicated and showed that occupational embeddedness had a negative relationship to occupational withdrawal intentions. In Part 4 a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to demonstrate that occupational embeddedness was distinguishable from occupational commitment. The paper also found that occupational embeddedness was correlated with occupational commitment but not social desirability. In addition, the paper found that it accounted for incremental variance in occupational withdrawal intentions beyond occupational commitment.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations include the fact that occupational withdrawal intentions rather than actual behaviors were measured. Overall, the results suggest that the new measure has sound psychometric qualities, and adequate discriminant, convergent and predictive validity. The paper concludes that use of the measure may contribute to the prediction/understanding of career withdrawal.Originality/valueA new measure of a construct that may be used to complement existing research and measures of work‐role attachment was developed.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference53 articles.
1. Allen, D. (2006), “Do organizational socialization tactics influence newcomer embeddedness and turnover?”, Journal of Management, Vol. 32, pp. 237‐56.
2. Allen, D. and Meyer, J. (1990), “The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 63, pp. 1‐18.
3. Ballout, H. (2009), “Career commitment and career success: moderating role of self‐efficacy”, The Career Development International, Vol. 14 No. 7, pp. 655‐70.
4. Bandalos, D. and Finney, S. (2001), “Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling”, in Marcoulides, G. (Ed.), New Developments and Techniques in Structural Equation Modeling, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
5. Bentler, P.M. (1990), “Comparative fit indices in structural model”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 107 No. 2, pp. 238‐46.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献